Posted by admin | Comments Off
Quick Guaranteed Loans is a website dedicated to all kinds of loans, including payday loans, personal, home improvement and debt counseling. The site provides a simplified application form for all those who want to apply for a loan online. Quick Guaranteed Loans offers fast loan with guaranteed approval. The company’s approval rate is in the neighborhood of 95%, which makes it one of the industry highest. The application process takes less than 5 minutes for most individuals. There is no credit check, which benefits all those who don’t have the luxury of good credit score.
When you apply for a loan, your application is instantly approved or denied (if you don’t meet basic requirements, which are a legal age, bank account and regular income). Once you are approved for a loan, you get money in a few hours. The company claims that most of their applicants receive a money transfer within an hour of their application.
Filed under Online Loans
Posted by admin | Comments Off
Fisher Investments is an excellent company providing a huge knowledge base to the public interested in economy, stock markets and money in general. Fisher Investments is a multi-billion dollar company, one of the world’s largest independent investment advisory firms. Whatever advisors from Fisher investments say, you’d better listen to them, especially if you’re an investor in the stock market. The company offers online resources with daily views on the markets and investing on its site MarketMinder.com, which brings readers the news of the day, along with insightful research analysis and market commentary.
If you want to know how the upcoming election is going to impact your portfolio, you can have a good read of a financial article from Fisher Investment dwelling on the subject on the MarketMinder.com website. It is a must to read for all those for whom money matters and who are looking for economic forecasts for 2012.
Filed under Markets
Posted by admin | Comments Off
The New Year is almost upon us, which means the time for reflection is upon us. Many of us set New Year’s goals whether they are financial or more personal in relation. If you have never thought about setting financial goals in the past, now is a good time to start. With the amount of debt the average US citizen has, especially in the middle class, it is time to see what can be done about it. What can you do to lower your debts next year? What are you willing to sacrifice to gain a better handle on your personal debts?
Finance is managing your funds, as well as how to secure new funds. In the world of general finance you have to prepare for how you can make your situation better. If you have dealt with payday loan direct lenders, but know that you need to stop this type of lending practice, you have to prepare to get out of the cycle. Likewise if you have credit card debt, you will need to consider how you can get out of debt and how quickly this will happen.
There are plenty of things you can do in order to get yourself out of debt. It just depends on what you are willing to do. Let’s take a look at how you might decide to finance next year.
One option open to you is to talk with a couple of banks to determine if you can obtain a personal loan or secured loan to reduce your monthly payments and interest. If you have equity in your home you may want to remortgage or get an equity mortgage to pay off your larger interest debts. Paying out 15 percent or more on a debt is unnecessary if you are in a position to get an equity loan or personal loan for 7 percent APR or less. There are products like this out there. So, now is a good time to search for them.
Also consider debt consolidation. With debt consolidation you may be able to pay off certain debts by cutting them in half. Companies like credit cards and are willing to settle for a lower payment if it means getting money from you. Debt consolidation can be the way for you to settle some of the more unseemly debts and get back on a financial track that helps you save for your retirement.
Filed under Finance
Posted by admin | Comments Off
Model risks are present in both appraised price estimates and the assessment of realization risks:
Second order price risks. Model assumptions that prices change in a linear way with an underlying factor can lead to material differences when curvature is present. This occurs with bonds and can be taken account of by using the measure convexity. Callable bonds with embedded options exhibit negative convexity as prices approach the call price. Tranches of mortgage backed securities provide particular challenges depending on pre-payment rates.
These risks are also present with options where this is referred to as gamma risk where the rate of change does not simply vary with the underlying factor but may even reverse sign. Price distribution. Most methods used to assess downside risks from particular trading positions are dependent on price changes being essentially random and having a “normal” distribution. This is not always the case. Some distributions are skewed, with a “long tail” in one direction, while others have a distribution close to that of the normal distribution but have “fat tails”. Fat tails occur when the incidence of occurrences at the extremes is greater than would be expected from a normal distribution.
A further implicit assumption is that price changes are not serially correlated, that is that price changes in one period are independent of price changes in prior periods. This assumption does not always hold.
Reversion to mean. A further assumption often made is that of reversion to mean. This means that past relationships between factors will continue to apply in the future. Examples of these include the following:
Price volatility. Methods to determine the likelihood of losses in a given period exceeding a particular level depends on the volatility of prices of the instruments concerned. A common assumption is that future volatility levels will revert back to historic levels or if they do change over time they change slowly.
Correlations. The level of potential losses for a portfolio of financial assets depends not only on price changes of individual instruments but the way in which such changes are related to one another. The prices of two instruments may tend to move together, or if the price of one instrument rises the price of the other tends to fall. These relationships are core to overall portfolio risks. These relationships are captured in a quantitative way through the use of correlation coefficients calculated on the basis of historic prices.
These correlation coefficients are assumed to remain stable over time. Risk premiums. The same considerations apply to the market equity risk premium and stock specific betas. Trading volumes. In estimating the time necessary to unwind a position the historic average daily trading volume is usually assumed.
Filed under MODEL RISKS | Tags: business, marketing, MODEL RISKS
Posted by admin | Comments Off
We have assumed that investors are risk-neutral—indifferent between two loans that have the same expected rate of return. As we have already mentioned, in the real world, risk-averse investors would demand and expect to receive a little bit more for the risky loan. Would you rather invest into a bond that is known to pay off 5% (for example, a U.S. government bond), or would you rather invest in a bond that is “merely” expected to pay off 5% (such as my 6.63% bond)? Like most lenders, you are likely to be better off if you know exactly how much you will receive, rather than live with the uncertainty of my situation. Thus, as a risk-averse investor, you would probably ask me not only for the higher promised interest rate of 6.63%, which only gets you to an expected interest rate of 5%, but an even higher promise in order to get you more than 6.63%. For example, you might demand 6.75%, in which case you would expect to earn not just 5%, but a little more. The extra 12 basis points is called a risk premium, and it is an interest component required above and beyond the time premium (i.e., what the U.S. Treasury Department pays for use of money over time) and above and beyond the default premium (i.e., what the promised interest has to be for you to just expect to receive the same rate of return as what the government offers).
Recapping, we know that 5% is the time-value of money that you can earn in interest from the Treasury. You also know that 1.63% is the extra default premium that I must promise you, a risk-neutral lender, to allow you to expect to earn 5%, given that repayment is not guaranteed. Finally, if you are not risk-neutral but risk-averse, I may have to pay even more than 6.63%, although we do not know exactly how much.
If you want, you could think of further interest decompositions. It could even be that the time-premium is itself determined by other factors (such as your preference between consuming today and consuming next year, the inflation rate, taxes, or other issues, that we are brushing over). Then there would be a liquidity premium, an extra interest rate that a lender would demand if the bond could not easily be sold—resale is much easier with Treasury bonds.The risk premium itself depends on such strange concepts as the correlation of loan default with the general economy. We can preview the relative importance of these components for you in the context of corporate bonds. The highest-quality bonds are called investment-grade. A typical such bond may promise about 6% per annum, 150 to 200 basis points above the equivalent Treasury. The probability of default would be small—less than 3% in total over a ten-year horizon (0.3% per annum). When an investment-grade bond does default, it still returns about 75% of what it promised. For such bonds, the risk premium would be small—a reasonable estimate would be that only about 10 to 20 basis points of the 200 basis point spread is the risk premium. The quoted interest rate of 6% per annum therefore would reflect first the time premium, then the default premium, and only then a small risk premium. (In fact, the liquidity premium would probably be more important than the risk premium.) For low-quality corporate bonds, however, the risk premium can be important. Ed Altman has been collecting corporate bond statistics since the 1970s. In an average year, about 3.5% to 5.5% of low-grade corporate bonds defaulted. But in recessions, the default rate shot up to 10% per year, and in booms it dropped to 1.5% per year. The average value of a bond after default was only about 40 cents on the dollar, though it was as low 25 cents in recessions and as high as 50 cents in booms. Altman then computes that the most risky corporate bonds promised a spread of about 5%/year above the 10-Year Treasury bond, but ultimately delivered a spread of only about 2.2%/year. 280 points are therefore the default premium. The remaining 220 basis points contain both the liquidity premium and the risk premium—perhaps in roughly equal parts.
Filed under Risk | Tags: Finance, Risk